What Polonius Said....
Ok, so I saw something on Facebook that really irked me.
(Just one thing?)
Ok, something in
particular, Captain Literal. I saw a meme that read "a woman can't
change a man because she loves him, a man changes himself because he loves her."
*blink blink*
No. Wrong. Absolutely not. The second part of this statement
is without question, unequivocally, undeniably, a piece of unadulterated
bullsh*t.
(Uh, tell us how you really feel….)
No. Wrong. Absolutely not. The second part of this statement
is –
(Okay, okay! We get it…. Total BS. I can't believe I'm
going to ask this question, but why?)
I'm glad you asked. The answer, which I'll state simply
before prattling on for multiple paragraphs in further explanation, can be
summed up thusly:
No one should
have to change themselves for love. Ever.
Here's the thing – I've been married. Twice. I've been
divorced. Twice. Sadly, and the hard way, I might add, I've learned a thing or
two about relationships. There's a lot more I can learn, don't get me wrong.
Frankly, no relationship is or ever will be perfect, and anyone who tells you
that you don't continue to learn, grow and/or adapt in a relationship should be
wearing a tinfoil hat. So, take it for what it's worth, but here are my
thoughts on the notion of changing for love:
1. You should never ask someone to change for love.
If a sentence beginning "If
you love me, then you will…" ever escapes your mate's lips, my advice is
to step back and reevaluate the relationship. If your mate is serious and
is asking you to make changes about
yourself, you need to question whether or not that person actually loves you, or some romanticized notion of you.
"If you love me you'll stop going
out with the boys." "If you love me, you'll wear tighter
dresses." Wrong. Because if you can't accept who I am, then you can't
accept me. No one is perfect. Everyone
has their quirks. No one should have to fundamentally change themselves in
order to garner the love of another. There's a big difference between change
and compromise.
We'll delve into this a little later…. But on this topic, try this instead:
If you love me, then you will never ask me to change who I am.
2. You should never expect someone to change for love.
This, in many ways, is even worse
than asking someone to change. Why? Because if you expect someone to change to conform to your
idealized notion of a mate, you're exhibiting a sense of entitlement you've no
business harboring. "If you love me, then I expect that you'll stop
wearing yoga pants in public." "If you love me, then I expect that
you'll buy me jewelry for every birthday." Nope. That's not how love
works. You don't enter a relationship only to expect someone to do a certain something
they don't usually do, or act in a certain way when they don't normally behave
in such a manor. You don't get to say
"If you're going to be with me, then I expect you to…." Nope. Nuh uh.
Sorry. When it comes to expectations:
If you love me, then I expect that you'll be understanding, accepting
and forgiving. You won't expect something of me that I cannot give, or shouldn't
have to give.
3. You should never think
that you need to change because you love someone.
"A man changes himself
because he loves her." No. A man changes himself because he thinks he
needs to change in order for her to love him.
He changes because he has low self-esteem. He changes because he has a warped
sense of love, and believes that in order to love someone he needs to alter who
he is regardless of the negative effect such change might have on him. He
changes, frankly, because she either asked him to, or because she expects him
to. [Note: I use the male example here because of the meme that started this
rant, but the notion applies equally to women as well.] "I love her, so I
have to stop listening to country music." "I love him, so I need to
make him breakfast every morning." F*ck. That. Repeat after me:
I do not need to change who I am or what I do because I love another.
Loving does not mean you need to
change your fundamental self. EVER.
Granted, there are of course
those instances when a person should
change, but I can pretty much guarantee that, in those circumstances, the person
needs to change for themselves, and not for the benefit of someone else. A
prime example of this is addiction, whether it be to alcohol, drugs, porn,
gambling, whatever the vice: such behavior should and must change because it is
self-destructive. Perhaps this is the exception to the rule,
because I do believe that in order to love another, you must first love
yourself, and be comfortable with yourself. "I need to stop drinking so
much because I'm hurting myself by doing so." "I need to change the
way I eat because I'm not being healthy and damaging my body." Fine, some
change is, unfortunately, necessary…. So maybe this:
If I love myself, I will change my own behavior that harms me, for me.
Alright, enough of the "you
should never." Let's try a couple "you should":
A. You should understand
that relationships will sometimes require compromise.
As I started to mention before,
compromise is not the same as change. You like country. She likes hip-hop. Should
you stop listening to country? Should she stop playing hip-hop? No, to both.
You compromise. You listen to her
music in her car. She tolerates country while in yours. You don't change your
listening preferences for love, you accept those of your mate and don't ask
that person to change their preferences, either. You prefer leather furniture. Your
mate is against animal products. So you compromise and get the microfiber with
the look and feel of leather but without the guilt. She loves Keanu Reeves
movies, so you kick her right the f*ck out.
(We've been waiting for something
like that…)
I jest, of course. I will
reluctantly agree that liking Keanu Reeves shouldn't be a deal-breaker. So you
compromise. If, on a Friday night, she wants to watch A Walk in the Clouds, you watch it. However… that means if you on a Friday night want to watch Star Wars, you watch that, too. It's all
about balance. You can support or appreciate the likes and desires of the other
without changing yourself in the process.
If we love each other, we will compromise with neither demand nor
resentment. If we cannot, then we do not truly love.
B. You should know that
there will be some things upon which you may never agree.
In this case it's all about acceptance,
and you have say to yourself "I don't like this aspect about him/her. Is
it something I can live with?" Say he likes his hair short/sports a
beard/wears an earing/wants a tattoo/whatever the case may be. Can you accept that fact? If you ask yourself
the question and you reply to yourself "well maybe I can get him to …."
Then you're not being fair, and you're asking him to change, and then you have
to really ask yourself if you love the person, or a fantasy version of them.
Here's a great example: I know of
a couple of relationships in which one partner is a Buffalo Bills fan, and the
other is a New England Patriots fan. There is NO agreement on fandom there, let
me be clear. A while back I jokingly posted a photo on social media of myself
holding a sign that said "I'm dating a Patriots fan. If this pic gets
1,000 likes she'll convert to a Bills fan." And boy did I get the likes.
However… Did I really expect her to become a Bills fan? No, of course not. It was
all in fun, and hell, she even took the picture. The point is, you need to
examine the relationship and those things about the other person with which you
disagree. If you can't live with those differences, and want or expect them to
change, then you're only going to hurt your partner and yourself in the long
run. It's all a matter of what you're willing to accept. And if you can't
accept something, honestly, there's nothing wrong with that.
(But what if…. )
Okay... If you're a racist, or a
bigot, or a misogynist, etc., and you can't accept that the other person
doesn't share your sentiments, well, then you're just an assh*ole. OTHERWISE….
If we love each other, we will accept those things about the other upon
which we cannot agree. If we cannot, then we do not truly love.
C. You can't make someone
else happy, even if you change.
Really. I'm not kidding. I forgot
this piece of advice for a while. You may think the other person will be happy
if you do this or that, act a certain way, or wear certain clothes. But the
truth is, happiness has to come from within. I've touched on this in other
posts before. You can be happy with someone,
not because of someone. You can contribute to someone's happiness, but
you cannot make them happy. You can
change yourself, but at what cost? If they truly want something, or even need
something, to be happy, and you have to change yourself to give him/or her that
thing, because you "love" that person, are you really doing a service
to either of you? Your mate in that instance cannot be happy unless you change,
meaning that he or she can't be happy with you.
Again, not fair, and unreasonable.
If we love each other, we will ensure that we are each happy with
ourselves first such that we neither require nor expect change in the other
person in order to be happy, nor believe that our love requires such change. If
we cannot, then we do not truly love.
"A man changes himself because he loves her." You couldn't be
more wrong.
"A woman can't change a man because
she loves him." You're godd*mn right.
Yea, so, that's what I think. You're free to agree, or disagree,
but I'm not going to change who I am for you. And you shouldn't change who you are, either.
Unless you like Keanu Reeves movies.
(HEY!)
I'm kidding! Jeez Louise. You know I can't stay too
serious for too long. It's who I am.
(And we wouldn't change a thing.)
This is why we have a healthy writer/reader relationship.
Perhaps Shakespeare's Polonius put it best:
"This
above all: To thine own self be true...."
© 2016 J.J.
Goodman. All rights reserved.
Comments
Post a Comment